[wvns] Manuel de Dieguez: Liberation of Europe
The top priority of international politics is to liberate Europe,
politically and militarily vassalized by the US since 1945.
Liberation of Europe
By Manuel de Diéguez
Introduction by Israel Shamir
Manuel de Diéguez is a leading contemporary French philosopher and a
friend of our list. We present a talk he gave to our French friends
and his interview with the Iranian TV in abbreviated form, while the
full and quite complicated text is presented (in English and French)
on our site www.israelshamir.net
His conclusion is: The top priority
of international politics is to liberate Europe, politically and
militarily vassalized by the US since 1945.
Now the Americans build a new vast "embassy" in Baghdad, rather an
occupation command centre for the area; and even optimists do begin to
understand that the US is NOT going home from the conquered Iraq, not
now, not in the next year, not at all, never. They do not go away.
Indeed, over half a century passed since the defeat of Germany, but
the US bases firmly remain in Europe and Japan.
The US military presence is the reason for Israel's influence in
Europe: while still colonising Europe, the Americans themselves were
colonised by the Jews and now are doing their will. Forget holocaust
stories: The US bases in Germany are the reason why Germany pays
billions to Israel.
The US military is the greatest danger to Europeans who live under
occupation as much as Iraqis and Palestinians do. While it is good
that our friends demand withdrawal from Iraq, we should demand as the
first step to send the US troops back home – from Iraq and from
Germany, from Italy and from Afghanistan.
These goals are interconnected: the Americans justify their military
presence in Europe by some imaginary threats.
(1) Iran is supposed to threaten Israel.
(2) North Korea is supposed to provide missiles to Israel's enemies;
(3) Islamic terror threatens Israel and
(4) Russia.
Out of four threats three are directly connected with Israel and Jews,
while the fourth is connected indirectly: Russia builds a nuclear
power station in Iran and supplies fighter jets to Syria. Russia still
has no large and central Holocaust Shrine next to – or instead of
Kremlin.
These threats are imaginary: Iran and Korea live their own lives and
do not interfere in the life of Europeans. Islamic terror is a sheer
fantasy: out of 500 terror attacks of last year, only one (failed) had
some connection to an Islamic group. Russia is traditionally
pro-European; only "new Europeans", i.e. pro-American Polish twins
still claim otherwise.
Why, then, these countries are picked as the threat? They are the main
non-occupied countries still at large on the globe. That is why we do
support these free lands of Russia and Iran, and wish them to remain
free. We also hope (together with de Diéguez) that Russia will help
Europe to break its chains.
The idea of Russia-Europe Axis is an old one; in order to avoid old
mistakes, this axis should pass via Berlin and Paris and lead to its
Istanbul, Teheran and Beijing extensions. We may dream of some unity
of Eurasia, unity that is not forced, multi-polar unity, rather than
an imperial dream.
The battle for Russian soul and mind is extremely important, for in
Russia there are strong pro-Zionist forces as well as patriotic non-
and anti-Zionists. President Putin, like Russia, is of two minds,
whether to join the victors or to support the hard-pressed people of
the Middle East and Europe.
Now at his recent summit with President Bush, the Zionist press
claimed Putin agreed to the anti-Iranian line of the US and Israel;
many papers carried headlines to such effect. But in a day or two the
fog of war was blown away.
Our American fellow-writer Tom Mysiewicz noticed that "On July 7th,
2007 the Voice of America broadcast a strongly critical diatribe
against Russia, specifically accusing Russia of:
*Endangering the peace and security of the world through
dangerous courtship of the Islamic world in order to advance its position;
*Supplying Iran with missiles that would endanger Israel's
proposed attack on Iranian nuclear facilities;
*Supplying Syria with sophisticated antitank weapons allegedly
then given to Hezbollah in Lebanon, leading to the destruction of
Israel's tank force; and,
*Favouring negotiations with Hamas in Palestine.
Tom concludes: "Despite numerous press reports indicting that Neocons
are "on their way out" there is nothing to indicate this. As the
American writer Mark Twain once stated in response to press reports of
his death: "The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated." In
actuality, there is nothing--except the possible opposition of Russia
or China--that can now stand in the way of an attack on Iran and a
larger war in the Mid East or worldwide."
And much depends on us, whether we will be able to form the line of
discourse to strengthen ties and friendship between independent
Russia, independent Iran, independence-seeking Europe and the
patriotic United States.
Liberation of Europe is a way to the American liberation, too. Undoing
of the US Empire will set the Americans free from their Jewish masters
of discourse, it will exorcise its Judaic spirit (in Marxist terms);
America will cease being a Golem and will find its own way. We welcome
all forces who support this idea.
===
Liberation of Europe
By Manuel de Diéguez
On June 4, 2007 Le Figaro published an interview of President Putin,
full of common sense and measure. The demonization of Russia has now
reached global proportions. But will Europe, herself made into a
vassal, accept that the American anti-missile system to be installed
in Poland and in the Czech Republic may function in automatic concert
with the nuclear arsenal of the United States? Will Europe, even
humiliated, accept that, for the first time, US-nuclear power is
installed on its soil? Will Europe, even domesticated, accept that the
world's political balance will be turned around with the purpose of
the definitive military subjugation of Copernicus' Continent to a
foreign empire, while we are not even being threatened by anybody?
Will an `enslaved' Europe now require of Vladimir Putin to help it
break its chains? Now that's the only real question.
Because this actually is about a desperate attempt by the United
States to recover the theo-political world-hegemony which their
crusader spirit appeared to promise them before the international
shipwreck of the democratic messianism they launched in Iraq.
The US is very effectively supported in its attempts at re-conquest of
European opinion by the complicity of the French press, starting with
Le Figaro, which took care not to publish the essential message of Mr.
Vladimir Putin to the Old World:
Question: Why do the Americans try to realize their plans with so much
tenacity if they are so obviously without real object?
Mr. Putin: Perhaps we are bringing Russia and Europe closer together,
and the Americans try to stop it. If this were the case, it would be
one more [US] mistake.
Question: Do you plan to install a similar system [an anti-missile
shield] in Cuba and Venezuela?
Mr. Putin: Not only it is not our intention, on the contrary, we even
dismantled our bases in Cuba. The Americans, however, build some of
theirs in Europe. After the fall of the Soviet Union, our policy
assumed a very different character. We want neither confrontation, nor
bases under our nose. The current Russian system relies mainly on
political decisions [instead of military options].
The censure by Le Figaro is not innocent: it is linked obviously to
the article of the new President of CRIF, Mr. Richard Prasquier, in Le
Monde, May 31, 2007: "Iran, the proliferating nuclear power", which
tries to divide Europeans by emphasising that the imaginary threat by
Iran would relate to Europe.
Europe is thus under an absolute moral obligation to find again its
sovereignty, which will require forming a sufficiently dissuasive
Euro-Russian axis to stop the planetary expansion of a military
empire, whose close cooperation with Israel constitutes for the moment
the central thrust. Fortunately, it is more than 40 years since our
country expelled the troops of the new occupants of Europe from our
territory. (De Gaulle expelled the US troops and bases from France, a
feat that was not repeated by any European state – ISH). If we don't
play -- even if we are alone, the card of refusal of submission, we
would betray not only our history, but the spirit of Europe. It is a
matter of resurrection, or death of a civilization.
We cannot stop the progress of the history of human dignity. It is for
this reason that Iran also has the right to have the nuclear weapon
just like the eight big insane countries now in possession of that
unusable bomb. The war is not a mutual suicide pact. It is absurd to
prohibit nuclear weapons to the remaining part of the universe.
Iranians: So, Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy, known to fear the Iranian bomb as
it would threaten Israel, is a case of political naivety?
MdD: Not at all, that relates to political `tartuffism' [calculated
sanctimony for profit, from Molière's Tartuffe character], a highly
calculated hypocrisy. Mr. Sarkozy is no `simple of spirit'.
Iranians: Under these conditions, how would you define the top
priority of international politics?
MdD: To liberate Europe, politically and militarily turned into a
vassal by the US since 1945, that's what appears to me the essential
imperative of today, that of the real France. But the Italian people
also start to open one eye and the German people are very close to
opening both. Even the Parliaments of the Länder begin to question the
duration of the American occupation. It is a slope of politics on
which one stops with difficulty. Admittedly, it has been 60 years that
the people of Europe have blindfolded themselves. But there will be a
German de Gaulle, a Spanish de Gaulle, an Italian de Gaulle. In face
of the warlike expansion of an empire, there remain only 2 possible
logics: that of submission and that of combat. Even the existence of
the yoke of NATO strikes European civilization by disinheritance
Iranians: What about the alliance between the United States and Israel?
MdD: There is an obvious contradiction between the public law of
democracies which recognizes to all people on Earth the right to
dispose for themselves and the precipitated and bellicose return to
Judea of the Jewish Diaspora scattered on all the continents since the
destruction of Jerusalem on 70 AD. It happens that this problem is
from now on narrowly connected to that of Europe occupied by NATO.
Plato explains in The Republic that a defeated generation generates
necessarily 2 generations of defeated men, but that the third
generation will no less necessarily rise. It is thus inevitable that
one day Europe will drive out the American garrisons from its
territory. If the United States won't present itself as back-up troops
of the god of liberty, whose genes are those of the Gospels, a giant
aircraft carrier of the US Navy would not be anchored in, the middle
of the Mediterranean for 60 years. This anchor place is still called
Italy, but only the Italians born between 1920 and 1930 still have
their eyes sufficiently open to be surprised about this state of
affairs. But the Italians born around 1970 will relearn to open them
wide again. The future belongs to them.
Iranians: Is the weight of Judaism excessive in the West?
MdD: President Carter published a political text, which caused great
commotion and in which he denounces the policy of apartheid that
Israel practises on a large scale by corralling the Palestinians in
huge concentration camps of Gaza and the West Bank. Jimmy Carter has
for a long time based himself on the theology of Kierkegaard, this
Protestant priest and philosopher of the individual who studied the
question of the relations of the "grace of God" with the fate of evil
- which brings us to asking America how it can be that it believes
herself to be God's Chosen, whereas it does behave as "Satan of the
world". You'll notice that the UN, however subjected to America's
"redemptiveness" and "evangelising", has condemned the Israeli wall of
apartheid.
Iranians: Isn't the sterility by which Western reason from now on
seems to be marked a disease caused by European imperialism, and this
disease isn't it a disease "to the death ", as Kierkegaard said?
MdD: All great civilisations spread its radiation by other means than
by the force of weapons. If Alexander had not launched the Greeks to
attack Asia, there wouldn't have been an universalisation of Greek
civilisation, if Rome had not carried the iron and the fire beyond its
borders, there wouldn't have been a civilisation of written law and of
a global heritage of the Athenian genius. The war brings to the winner
economic prosperity, and after that potentially a blossoming culture.
This is why it should be kept in mind that, in the eyes of the United
States, 1945 isn't the year of the liberation of Europe, but that of
their own military triumph on a global scale, of which they say
themselves that it carried them to a power higher than that of the
Roman empire, higher than that of the reign of Charles the Fifth,
higher than that of Napoleon's empire, higher than that of the British
Commonwealth, a triumph which for a long time enabled them to impose
the dollar as the only reserve currency of the world. Today, it's also
by weapons that the American empire perishes under our eyes, and its
descent into the abyss will be sealed by its defeat in Iraq. Why has
this global shipwreck become inevitable, if not because Russia & China
are from now on able to prevent an American empire, which is already
secretly desperate and out of breath, from defying one last time the
fatality of its death by an ultimate rush on the oil of Iran and
Sudan? But it is too late for going on with the military expansion of
the empire on a global scale.
This is to say that occupied Europe will shake the yoke of NATO as
soon as the American empire will have been overcome by a general
revolt of its vassals. All the remainder is only a vain chattering,
because it is quite impossible that a continent that for a certain
period has been occupied by a foreign army does not one day find again
one day its sovereignty.
Iranians: In this context, do you believe that the Israel- Palestinian
conflict is an incurable disease?
MdD: When everyone will have understood that Israel undefeated will
never agree to return to the borders of 1967 and when vassalized
Europe cannot pretend any more to think it will, this State will have
an appointment with Kierkegaard, who will say to him: "You were sick
of your false justice. Now you must decide if this disease is fatal."
*********************************************************************
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
Email ummyakoub@yahoo.com for instructions.
To leave this list, send an email to:
wvns-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:wvns-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:wvns-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
wvns-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
No comments:
Post a Comment