[wvns] US Bombs Pakisan Again. Hello?
US Military Bombards Targets Inside Pakistan
By Peter Symonds
29 August, 2007
WSWS.org
http://www.countercurrents.org/symonds290807.htm
In an aggressive new step, the US military shelled and destroyed
targets across the Afghan border inside Pakistan on Sunday. While it
has received scant coverage in the American and international media,
the attack foreshadows more extensive US cross-border operations that
have the potential to further destabilise Pakistani President Pervez
Musharraf's uncertain grip on power.
The US-led coalition in Afghanistan issued a statement declaring that
Pakistan had given permission for an attack on Taliban positions
inside its borders. Occupation forces in the eastern province of
Paktika used artillery and mortar fire to destroy six positions—three
inside Afghanistan, and three across the border in Pakistan. According
to the statement, at least 12 insurgents were killed in the barrage.
Pakistani officials emphatically denied giving approval for the
assault. Military spokesman Major General Waheed Arshad declared,
"There was no attack [from Pakistan], no firing from our side of the
border. And there was no permission asked by them or given by us."
Pakistani Foreign Office spokesperson Tasnim Aslam dismissed further
US claims that Washington had an understanding with Islamabad to allow
cross-border attacks as "speculative and fabricated".
Late Monday, the US military belatedly conceded that no permission had
been given. "We regret the miscommunications in this event," Brigadier
General Joseph Votel, deputy commander of NATO's eastern region,
declared. However, he made no apology for the attack itself and gave
no guarantee that US forces would not engage in further cross-border
attacks.
The incident follows a series of statements by Bush administration
officials indicating that the US military would take unilateral action
inside Pakistan against Taliban and Al Qaeda targets. Late last month,
Bush's Homeland Security Adviser Frances Townsend was asked on Fox
News why the US was not sending predator drones and special forces
into Pakistan. "Well, just because we don't speak about things
publicly doesn't mean we're not doing many of the things you're
talking about," she replied.
During a press conference earlier this month, President Bush dodged a
question about seeking Pakistani approval before sending in US troops.
While noting the Pakistani president's past cooperation and shared
concerns about "terrorism", Bush stressed: "I'm confident, with real
actionable intelligence, we will get the job done." US and Afghan
officials had been demanding for months that Musharraf take tougher
action against anti-US insurgents based in Pakistan's tribal areas
along the border with Afghanistan.
There is no doubt that the US military has already taken action inside
Pakistan. An Associated Press report published last week revealed
that, as early as 2004, the rules of engagement for elite US special
forces had authorised "hot pursuit" of anti-occupation fighters into
Pakistan without seeking prior approval from Islamabad. The documents
laid out circumstances in which US troops could penetrate up to 10
kilometres into Pakistani territory. Pakistani villagers have
protested on a number of occasions against US incursions and attacks,
including aerial bombings.
To date, the Bush administration has played down cross-border
operations to minimise the political fall-out for Musharraf, who
confronts widespread domestic opposition over his support for the US
occupation of Afghanistan and the bogus "war on terror". For its part,
the Pakistani regime has trod a fine line: publicly insisting that the
US military observe its borders, while collaborating closely behind
the scenes. The Associated Press article reported that the US military
had established a liaison office in Islamabad that was responsible for
notifying local authorities of US incursions into Pakistan.
US demands for tougher Pakistani action against Islamist militants
have made Musharraf's position even more precarious. Last month's
bloody end to the siege of Islamabad's Red Mosque, or Lal Masjid, in
which more than 100 people were killed, provoked widespread revulsion,
denunciations of Musharraf as an American stooge and calls for his
ousting. Attacks on Pakistani security forces by Islamic extremists
have sharply escalated, with clashes taking place on a daily basis in
tribal border areas. Major General Arshad told the media last Friday
that around 250 militants and 60 troops had died over the previous
month, including in suicide attacks on soldiers and police.
Musharraf is also facing concerted pressure from the major opposition
parties. Exiled former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, who was ousted by
Musharraf in a military coup in 1999, declared he would contest
national elections after the country's Supreme Court ruled last week
that there was no barrier to his return. Another exiled former prime
minister, Benazir Bhutto, has engaged in talks with Musharraf to reach
an arrangement that would enable her to return and take part in elections.
Musharraf is confronting growing demands to step aside as the
country's military commander if he seeks re-election as president. In
the first sign of overt opposition in his own administration, one of
Musharraf's cabinet ministers resigned on Monday and called for him to
step down as head of the army. The dilemma for the increasingly
beleaguered military strongman is that the army will only remain as a
secure base of support if he stays at its head. The fighting in border
areas has already opened up rifts in the army, which has had close
ties to Islamist groups, includes significant numbers of Pashtuns, and
previously backed the Taliban in Pashtun areas of Afghanistan.
US cross-border attacks into Pakistan will only compound Musharraf's
political problems. While the clash on Sunday has been minimised,
Washington has not ruled out further attacks. Faced with a
deteriorating military situation in Afghanistan and the contorted
logic of his "war on terror", President Bush is under pressure to act
against so-called Al Qaeda sanctuaries. Earlier his month, Democratic
presidential contender Barack Obama publicly called for US troops to
move against Al Qaeda forces inside Pakistan—with or without
Islamabad's approval.
Inside Afghanistan, US and coalition troops are confronting a rising
tide of attacks by insurgents as well as widespread popular opposition
to the five years of occupation, which has brought nothing but death
and destruction to large parts of the country. Another five foreign
troops died in fighting on Monday, taking the death toll for the year
to more than 150. The 2007 figure is set to pass last year's toll of
more than 190—the highest since the 2001 invasion.
Last Sunday's attack on alleged Taliban positions inside Pakistan may
indicate the start of more aggressive US interventions, regardless of
the impact on the country's stability. One of the first casualties of
such American action could well be Musharraf, who has been an
important ally in legitimising and prosecuting the Bush
administration's "war on terror".
*********************************************************************
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
Email ummyakoub@yahoo.com for instructions.
To leave this list, send an email to:
wvns-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:wvns-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:wvns-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
wvns-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
No comments:
Post a Comment