[wvns] Steven Palese: Words Matter
Words Matter: The Racism and Anti-Semitism Word Games
By Steven Palese
Introduction by Israel Shamir
So What?
Steven Palese offers an article dealing with organized Jewry's
strategy in the US (see below). His observations and findings are
valid. But – like everybody else in the US – he finds it difficult to
talk about Jews, so he uses outdated (and unacceptable to many
Americans) color-based terminology of "whites", as if "blacks" are in
a different situation versus organized Jewry. Following Kevin
MacDonald, he speaks of "asserting white group interests", while we
would say, "protecting majority's rights". This is not an empty
theoretical question of words: "asserting white group interests" means
imitating Judaic strategy, while "protecting majority rights" means a
Christian strategy of fighting Judaic operation by other means, from
majority's point of view.
His main conclusion: Jews push non-Jews out of good jobs, and if and
when the process goes other way, the Jews scream about "antisemitism".
We observe this process through history: Jews take too many good or
important jobs, until the majority gets its act together and pushes it
back. This push-back is usually described by the Jews as "a wave of
antisemitism", instead of calling it "affirmative action on behalf of
majority". While justifiably accusing the Jews of misusing words,
Palese (and other followers of Kevin MacDonald all the way to David
Duke) did not find a way to use words correctly in present environment.
The US Christian majority may and should bring their minority Jews
into direct proportion with their weight, but what weight? Now, this
is in direct proportion with their joint assets and income. Some can
wish to adjust it to their weight within population, ie 2 percent at
least, so that no more than 2 pc of management may be Jewish anytime.
Others would say: into direct proportion with their weight within the
US forces in Iraq. As our friend Daniel McGowan noticed, "while Jews
constitute about 2 percent of the American population, they account
for only 0.2 to 0.3 percent of the active-duty troops and casualties."
Then, not more that 0.2 pc of the management may be Jewish. This is
also more egalitarian than income-based influence, as it is now. Or
otherwise, the Americans may act on reciprocity basis, by allowing
Jewish representation being equal to that of non-Jews in the Jewish
state's management, which probably will come to the same 0.2 percent.
Americans may learn from Jews. Steven Palese quotes Michael Medved's
article called "Jews Run Hollywood. So What?" This is the correct
answer. Would such an adjustment be called 'antisemitism'? You bet it
would, but so what?
===
The Racism and Anti-Semitism Word Games
Steven Palese
http//:mantra7777.blogspot.com
When whites engage in favoritism toward other whites (and therefore
discrimination against non-whites), it's called "racism". When other
groups engage in favoritism, it's called "ethnic solidarity". When
whites object to Jewish favoritism, it's called "anti-semitism". When
you buy into these word games, it's called being a useful idiot.
THE DUAL PERSECUTION STRATEGY
When Michael Eisner was appointed CEO of Disney, one of the five
mega-media conglomerates (Disney has many media assets besides Mickey
Mouse, such as ABC), within months he purged upper management to make
way for fellow Jews. Had any victim objected to such Jewish
favoritism, they would have been subject to neo-McCarthyite
persecution for "anti-semitism". These persecutions are led by Jewish
organizations (such as the ADL) and consist of organized blacklists,
intimidation and economic strangulation of dissidents. See the
Walt-Mearsheimer report on the Israel Lobby for details regarding
Neo-McCarthyite persecution methodology.
Michael Medved boasted: "The famous Disney organization, which was
founded by Walt Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored
anti-semitic attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all
its most powerful positions." ("Jews Run Hollywood. So What?," Moment
magazine, August 1996.)
The policy: When whites object to Jewish favoritism they face
neo-McCarthyite persecution for "anti-semitism".
Reverse the scenario. Suppose whites took over Disney, purged most
Jews from upper management and replaced them with fellow whites. Would
such an attempt by whites to compete on equal terms be tolerated?
When Michael Regan, an Assistant District Attorney expressed concern
for white group interests, the mildest form of pro-white favoritism,
he was immediately subject to neo-McCarthyite persecution for
"racism". As with "anti-semitism" witch hunts, these are led by Jewish
organizations and involve neo-McCarthyite persecution methodology.
"Regan's fate was sealed when the Washington Post published his
observation, from an interview at the conference, that "you can see
European Christian Americans are an endangered species."
Though there was nothing explicitly "anti-Semitic" in Regan's comment,
the Anti-Defamation League, America's most feared and effective
thought police, promptly attacked his reputation and his livelihood.
In a letter to Regan's superior, the ADL's regional director for New
York decreed: "Those kinds of comments are absolutely inappropriate
for a public official to make," and Regan was promptly out of a job."
(http://www.theoccidentalquarterly.com/vol6no1/61-EditorsNote.pdf )
The policy: When whites engage in favoritism they face neo-McCarthyite
persecution for "racism".
The Dual Persecution Strategy is this policy of both persecuting
whites who object to favoritism by others and persecuting whites who
get uppity and try the same. This "favoritism for them, persecution
for us" double standard creates a systemic competitive imbalance
designed to prevent whites from competing on equal terms.
ETHNIC CLOSED SHOPS
An uneven playing field makes it easy for ethnic closed shops to
squeeze whites out of any field. The long term consequence is what we
see happening in vital organs of society such as media:
"Four of the largest five entertainment giants are now run or owned by
Jews. Murdoch's News Corp (at number four) is the only gentile holdout
-- however Rupert is as pro-Israel as any Jew, probably more so." (Los
Angeles Jewish Times, 'Yes, Virginia, Jews Do Control the Media,' Oct.
29-Nov. 11, 1999 p. 14)
"Time-Warner, Disney, Viacom-CBS, News Corporation and Universal rule
the entertainment world in a way that the old Hollywood studio chiefs
only dreamed of. And, after all the deals and buyouts, four of the
five are run by Jews. We're back to where we started, bigger than ever."
(Jewish Week, 9-17-99, 12)
"The greatest concentration of Jews, however, is at the producer level
-- and it is the producers who decide which stories will go on the
air, and how long, and in what order, they will run. In 1982, before a
shift in assignments, the executive producers of all three evening
newscasts were Jews, as were the executive producers of CBS's 60
Minutes and ABC's 20/20. And Jews are almost equally prominent at the
'senior producer' and 'broadcast producer' levels as well as in senior
management. When Reuven Frank stepped down as president of NBC News in
1984, for example, he was replaced by Laurence Grossman, who left the
presidency of PBS to take the position." (Charles Silberman, A Certain
People. American Jews and Their Lives Today, Summit Books, 1985, p. 154)
If you buy into "racism" or "anti-semitism" word games, you're
consenting to the Dual Persecution Strategy. In doing so, you're
supporting an uneven playing field designed to dispossess whites and
empower Jews and therefore, by extension, empower the Jewish lobby's
agenda. This includes advancing Zionism (Middle East wars), racial
engineering (immigration, diversity and multiculturalism) and
censorship (political correctness and "hate" speech laws).
This agenda is set by an interlocking network of over 300 national
Jewish organizations and 4000 foundations with a combined annual
budget of $6 billion. (http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/books-Preface.html
). Although advancing Zionism is this network's top priority,
promoting mass immigration is a close second:
'"Once you get past the Israel issue, it's near the top of the list of
priorities for a lot of groups," said Haddar Susskind, Washington
representative for the Jewish Council for Public Affairs (JCPA).
"It's one issue where there's mostly agreement between progressive
grass-roots groups and the big national organizations," said Mik
Moore, director of policy for the Jewish Funds for Justice. "There is
a real sense of common cause."'
(http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=13852 )
INTIMIDATION OF POLITICIANS AND MEDIA
The political process is also affected. James Abourezk, former US
Senator from South Dakota, clearly describes how the "anti-semitism"
side of the Dual Persecution Strategy keeps the US Congress in line:
"I can tell you from personal experience that, at least in the
Congress, the support Israel has in that body is based completely on
political fear--fear of defeat by anyone who does not do what Israel
wants done. I can also tell you that very few members of Congress--at
least when I served there--have any affection for Israel or for its
Lobby. What they have is contempt, but it is silenced by fear of being
found out exactly how they feel. I've heard too many cloakroom
conversations in which members of the Senate will voice their bitter
feelings about how they're pushed around by the Lobby to think
otherwise. In private one hears the dislike of Israel and the tactics
of the Lobby, but not one of them is willing to risk the Lobby's
animosity by making their feelings public." ("Former Senator James
Abourezk on Chomsky and the Israel Lobby in the US", Al-Jazeerah,
December 5, 2006.)
James Abourzek also makes clear that the "anti-semitism" side of the
Dual Persecution Strategy is what holds those elements of the media
not controlled through ownership or staffing in check:
"Secondly, the Lobby is quite clear in its efforts to suppress any
congressional dissent from the policy of complete support for Israel
which might hurt annual appropriations. Even one voice is attacked, as
I was, on grounds that if Congress is completely silent on the issue,
the press will have no one to quote, which effectively silences the
press as well. Any journalists or editors who step out of line are
quickly brought under control by well organized economic pressure
against the newspaper caught sinning." ("Former Senator James Abourezk
on Chomsky and the Israel Lobby in the US", Al-Jazeerah, December 5,
2006.)
If you buy into "racism" or "anti-semitism" word games, you're
consenting to the Dual Persecution Strategy. In doing so, you're
supporting the Jewish lobby's coordinated intimidation of politicians
and media and therefore, by extension, you're supporting the Jewish
lobby's agenda. This includes advancing Zionism, racial engineering
and censorship.
COLLABORATORS AND USEFUL IDIOTS
Collaborators typically get a payoff for selling out. In apartheid
South Africa, blacks who were against black group interests and
favored white group interests (uncle Toms) were allowed into the black
elite. In Judeo-America, whites who are against white group interests
and favor minority group interests (collaborators) get to stay in the
white elite. White elites who violate this adapted "Code of the Uncle
Tom" are filtered out by the Dual Persecution Strategy.
Immigration is an issue that illustrates these contrasting white and
minority group interests and the anomalous behavior of white elites.
Majority opinion has been against immigration, legal or illegal, since
polling began.
(http://www.numbersusa.com/interests/publicoparchive.html ). Yet,
decade after decade, immigration continues. What is blocking the
democratic process?
A recent opinion poll shows that while almost 80% of the public is
against mass immigration and 60% consider it a critical threat, only
14% of the opinion elite (members of Congress, the administration,
leaders of church groups, business executives, union leaders,
journalists, academics, and heads of major interest groups) share the
public's concern.
(http://www.vdare.com/roberts/immigrationdictatorship.htm ).
Although collaborators are a minority, they are part of the elite. As
opinion polls show, they are not powerful enough to convince the
majority that racial engineering (immigration, diversity and
multiculturalism) is good. But, being part of the elite, they are
powerful enough to block the democratic process and force racial
engineering on the public against its will.
Although collaborators agree that an African who wants to become a
minority in his own country is either an "uncle Tom" or clinically
insane, they themselves are not insane and do not consider themselves
such. The vast majority collaborates out of fear of the Dual
Persecution Strategy or out of career opportunism, not because they
actually believe in Zionism, racial engineering or censorship.
In summary, if you buy into "racism" or "anti-semitism" word games,
you're supporting Zionism, racial engineering and censorship. If
you're white and not part of the opinion elite, you're collaborating
for nothing.
A useful idiot is someone who sells out for free.
*********************************************************************
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
Email ummyakoub@yahoo.com for instructions.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:wvns-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:wvns-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
wvns-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
No comments:
Post a Comment