An American lawyer weighs in on Dr. Aafia Siddiqui's caseþ
THE PEACE Thru JUSTICE FOUNDATION
DHUL HIJJAH 1431 A.H. (December 6, 2010)
Assalaamu Alaikum (Greetings of Peace): We begin with an important notice from the Family of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui.
To Supporters of Dr. Aafia:
This is to inform supporters that MLFA [Muslim Legal Fund of America] will no longer be involved with funding for Dr. Aafia's case, and any monies donated to them will not go towards any aspect of Dr. Aafia's case.
The family have requested that MLFA kindly cease to use Dr. Aafia's case, her name, statements or any statement from family members for their fund raising activities in order to avoid confusion among potential donors.
We remain thankful for all sincere efforts provided in the past.
Criminal Law Blog by Defense Lawyer John Floyd and Mr. Billy Sinclair
WIKILEAKS RENEW DR. AAFIA SIDDIQUI MYSTERY
December 5, 2010
86-year prison term for Dr. Siddiqui: Victory in Courtroom is Loss on Worldwide Public Stage
By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair
This website has maintained an ongoing interest in the bizarre case of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui (hereand here). We have stated we do not know if the Pakistani native is a brilliant neuroscientist or an al Qaeda terrorist as our Government has repeatedly charged she is. What we do know is that our Government has cloaked the Siddiqui case in such mystery and secrecy that we believe she was most likely kidnapped, along with her three children, by Pakistan's infamous intelligence agency in Karachi in 2003 and turned over to our Government who placed her in secret detention in Bagram military prison in Afghanistan where she was subjected to torture and other forms of debilitating abuse.
Just months after U.S. District Court Judge Richard M. Berman, sitting in the Southern District of New York, imposed an 86-year prison term on Dr. Siddiqui following her conviction for shooting American military personnel after her detention in Ghanzi, Afghanistan in July 2008, the highly publicized and controversial WikiLeaks disclosures of U.S. State Department classified cables has reawaken what the British newspaper, The Guardian, calls "one of the most vexed mysteries of the Bush-era `war on terror'."
One cable from the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan, dated July 31, 2008 (two weeks after Siddiqui's capture in Afghanistan), stated: "Bagram officials have assured us that they have not been holding Siddiqui for the last four years, as has been alleged." Earlier cables from the embassy in February addressed the widespread public protest and outrage in Pakistan following Siddiqui's conviction in February 2010. At that time U.S. Ambassador Anne Patterson charged the protests were the result of "one-sided" media coverage in Pakistan about the case.
The mystery surrounding Dr. Siddiqui's strange disappearance from Karachi in 2003 assumed an international life form in 2008 when, according to the Peace thru Justice Foundation, four men escaped from the Bagram prison and began to share stories about a Pakistani woman known as "Prisoner 650" who had been repeatedly subjected to torture and physical abuse at the hands of U.S. Government and military personnel. After a British citizen named Binyan Mohamed was released from U.S. secret detention, he positively identified a photograph of Dr. Siddiqui as "Prisoner 650." The Prisoner 650/Dr. Siddiqui story was picked up by British journalist Yvonne Ridley who coined her as the "Gray Lady of Bagram." The "Gray Lady" term was employed because Ridley said "Prisoner 650" appeared to be a "ghost" by all those who saw her and heard her screams echoing following torture sessions at the infamous Bagram prison.
During Dr. Siddiqui's trial last February, the Government went to great lengths to keep the five years she disappeared from the face of the earth "off limits" to the jury that convicted her. Why? Because the Government, we believe, is hiding secrets about what it did to Dr. Siddiqui during those five years. Tragically, whether or not Dr. Siddiqui was ever actually in Bagram prison and tortured there is no longer the real issue. The issue now is that the world believes she was, especially the people of Pakistan. Perception is often more powerful than reality.
Should we be concerned about what the people of Pakistan think about the United States? Yes, as long as we are sending billions of dollars in military and economic aid to the country to secure their assistance in our so-called "war on terror," we must have good relations with its people. The WikiLeaks cables themselves reflect that far beyond the Dr. Siddiqui case our relationship with the Pakistani government, particularly its intelligence and military branches, is strained to say the least. The Dr. Siddiqui affair is, and will remain, a sticky-wicket in trying to work through these tense political and military relationships.
The American public will never know all the immoral, unethical and illegal things our Government did during the Bush-era "war on terror." The outrageous tragedy about this so-called war-on-terror declared by former President George W. Bush in the wake of the horrible 9/11 Twin Tower attacks is that it has cost us more, both in human lives and economic loss, than any terror attack the war was designed to present would have cost us. In Iraq alone, we have incurred 4,429 deaths and 32,937 wounded or seriously injured while another 320,000 of our returning troops suffer from some form of psychological trauma and an average of 18 are committing suicide each day in this country. In Afghanistan, we have incurred 1,415 deaths and 2,309 wounded or seriously injured, and the number are increasing daily. The total costs of these two wars—most of which was waged "on credit" during the Bush years—to American taxpayers is nearly $1.2 trillion.
The earliest possible withdrawal date from Afghanistan has now been set for 2014 with some military experts saying it may be another ten years before we see a complete withdrawal of U.S. forces from that incorrigible country. All U.S. forces are scheduled to be withdrawn from Iraq by the end of 2011. In the meantime we will continue to experience more human casualties and irreparable damage to our national economy and democratic reputation as we wage the so-called "war on terror." The costs of funding these wars, both on the battlefield and in the human damage they inflict on our military personnel, will increase exponentially and remain a fiscal drain on our economy. And just to put this issue into a clearer perspective, the House Veterans Affairs Committee was recently informed by prominent economists that the lifetime medical care and benefits for troops returning from these two wars who were disabled by their service will costs taxpayers another $1.3 trillion.
And what is the end result of these staggering costs to human lives and our economic well-being: the United States has become an international boogeyman attracting more "terrorists" who are willing to harm and attack the United States than there were in 2001. The terrorists have won the war—if not on the battlefield, then in the hearts and minds of many young people worldwide who now see America as "foreign occupiers" and "oppressors" trying to rule with the world with the facade of Democracy but the reality of empire. We have become to approximately one-third of the world's population the spit of the earth.
In Pakistan alone, with our predator drone strikes, we have created more "militants" (or "terrorists" depending upon the locale) than we have eliminated. These drone attacks began in Pakistan began in 2004. The New America Foundation reports that there have been 199 drone attacks in northwest Pakistan with 103 of them coming in 2010 alone. Hundreds of innocent Pakistani civilians have been killed in these attacks. Pakistani authorities report that in 2009 alone 708 innocent civilians were killed in 44 drone attacks with only five of these strikes hitting al Qaeda or Taliban "terrorists," meaning that 140 innocent Pakistanis had to die in order for us to kill one terrorist. Is there any wonder why we are so hated in the tribal regions that protect Osama bin Laden and his terrorist cohorts?
And hanging over all these innocent lives lost, and the loss of "good will" among Pakistanis for Americans they have produced, is the symbolic case of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui. This one woman, who many believe has been driven into the darkest depths of mental illness at the hands of American torturers, now looms as a dark cloud over every American and Pakistani relation. We will never truly have any semblance of trust with the Pakistani people again so long as we keep the "Gray Lady of Bagram", who has become a national icon in her country, incarcerated in an American prison labeled a "threat" to our national security.
As a gesture of good will, our Government should find a way to send Dr. Siddiqui home to be with her people, her family and her surviving children. If our Government can swap 10 "sleeper" Russian agents for four Americans held in Russian prisons as it did this past summer, then it can certainly return Dr. Siddiqui to her native Pakistan.
The bottom line is this: Dr. Siddiqui has not killed a single American. We have killed thousands of innocent Pakistanis trying to kill al Qaeda terrorists and Taliban insurgents who pose no legitimate threat to Americans as they sit in the rugged mountains of northwest Pakistan. The political damage caused to the Pakistani government and the loss of international goodwill to our country is simply not worth keeping Dr. Siddiqui in an American prison for the rest of her natural life.
By: Houston Criminal Attorney John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
To leave this list, send an email to:
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
Please consider contributing to WVNS today.
Email firstname.lastname@example.org !
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: