Index

Monday, January 14, 2008

GOVERNMENT FEARS ARMED VETERANS

WHY DOES THE GOVERNMENT FEAR ARMED VETERANS?
by Alan Stang
January 4, 2008
http://www.newswithviews.com/Stang/alan24.htm


Recent passage by the District of Criminals of the legislation known
colloquially as the Veteran Disarmament bill raises the question of
why the conspiracy for world government would want to disarm returning
veterans. The conspiracy trusted these men to use the most devastating
ordinance abroad; it does not trust them to keep and bear much smaller
weapons here at home. The obvious answer is that these are the
millions of well trained military men I was talking about in my recent
piece about a possible assassination threat to Dr. Ron Paul.

These are the men the psychos at the top are afraid of, the men who
can stick the red dot in their eye from a mile away. The psychos know
these men are out there, watching, stewing, temperatures rising every
day; they are beginning to understand that they are dying now because
the psychos have poisoned them with Depleted Uranium in the field.

They are beginning to realize that the buddies and the limbs they left
behind in Iraq were lost not in defense of this beloved country but in
behalf of the megalomaniacal nightmare of conquest the psychos think
is "normal." Now the veterans understand that the monsters who sent
them half way around the world to get sick are dismantling the system
of freedom the Founding Fathers gave us here at home.

So far, they haven't said much, but the psychos know they are
simmering and that something could set them off. So, the Nazis at the
top want their guns, because it is very nerve wracking to have to keep
watching your chest and tum-tum, hoping that if you see the red dot
there soon enough you will have time to hunker down before the round
that follows it smashes through your perfumed skull and distributes
gobs of your polluted brain all over the haute couture ensembles of
the distinguished ladies enjoying cocktails on the balcony of your
penthouse.

Proof that they are crazy is their assumption that passage of this
"law," signed by Communist world government traitor Jorge W. Boosh,
will intimidate these men – who have come home from Hell – into
surrendering the ordinance they are buying to the bare walls at gun
shows and stores; which logically brings us to the proper application
of the Second Amendment.

Some Americans understand that the main purpose of the Second
Amendment is not hunting, not sport shooting and not even
self-defense, although it would certainly underwrite those worthy
activities. No, the Fathers wanted each and all of us to be armed in
the event that somewhere down the road this shaky experiment they had
created but did not trust themselves – the federal government – were
to get out of control and try to destroy our rights.

They wanted us to "keep and bear" – to carry – the guns we would need
to do the job if it became necessary to "abolish" the government.
Remember, the government is not the country. They are two entirely
different things. The District of Criminals is the government. You are
the country.

Of course, these are not my ideas. I can't take credit for them.
Remember that the nation's birth certificate – the Declaration of
Independence – says that whenever government becomes oppressive,
whenever it tries to deny their rights, the people under it have the
unalienable right to rise up and cast it off, even "abolish" it.

So, I write with the authority and under the protection of the
President of the United States, because the man who wrote the
Declaration later became President. Indeed, he also wrote that every
generation or so, the people should rise up and enjoy a bloody
revolution, in which the tree of liberty is refreshed "with the blood
of patriots and tyrants," presumably to remind everyone who has the power.

Many Americans know this and believe it, but I have yet to see a piece
by some expert explaining what it would be like today to "abolish" the
federal government as the Declaration teaches. How would it be done?
Remember, I am merely speculating about some statements by the
President of the United States. I am advocating nothing. I am too
decrepit to do something myself. Shirley Temple in her prime could
take me down. And everyone I know is as decrepit as I am. I do know
from the movies that the bullet comes out of the round hole in the
gun, but that is all I know.

No, I am merely speculating as a professional commentator for almost
fifty years about what others – others I don't know – could elect to
do. The fury of the responses I am still receiving from around the
world to my pieces about the possible assassination of Dr. Ron Paul
tell me that such speculation is desperately needed today – especially
from the real military experts –but, strangely, I have seen none. So
you will have to settle for speculation from me.

Who, in the Founding Fathers thinking, would abolish the government,
if it goes wrong? It would be the militia. What was and is the
militia? Despite the obfuscatory efforts of Nazi gun confiscators like
Carolyn McCarthy and Sarah Brady (Lord preserve us from crazy women
whose husbands have been shot!) and Chuck Schumer (another schmuck),
the Fathers said the militia was the able-bodied men in a community,
i.e., the veterans the Nazis are now trying to disarm.


Advertisement

What the Fathers could not anticipate, and would be utterly horrified
to learn, is that the experiment they created – and were so suspicious
of themselves – has by now metastasized into a totalitarian monster
that makes George III and his charming, little tea tax look pleasantly
quaint, something Ludwig von Mises and Dr. Ron Paul would endorse as a
classic exemplar of Free Enterprise.

With the destruction by the Boosh treason gang of the Posse Comitatus
law, our military now can intervene domestically like George III's
British Army. Local police have been militarized. Their SWAT teams
have been trained to perform military functions. Brainwashing has
turned some of them into imperial zombies who would make Darth Vader
proud. The Boosh treason gang has canceled habeas corpus, the ancient
jewel of our system of law, and its ability to spy on us would inspire
Heinrich Himmler to register Republican.

Many commentators make the point that we must tread with great
caution, to avoid giving Boosh & Co. the excuse to impose martial law.
Those warnings are very wise. The Boosh treason gang is looking for
such an excuse to try their new weapons that can fry your brains and
look inside your underwear. If the militia accidentally gives them
one, they will use it to cover and justify themselves.

But if the militia does not, the Boosh treason gang would not stand
down and go home. It would concoct a reason. What we are really
talking about here is timing, is when it will happen. Remember that
four-star general Tommy Franks, who led the invasion of Iraq, said
that the next emergency like Nine Eleven would cancel the
Constitution. And when a four-star general speaks, I listen. So, the
mistake the militia could make is not to act; it is to act at the
wrong time.

Despite this, some people say the risk is too great; that only the
moral power of non-violent resistance could work. Yes, it could and
did, in British India and the American South. But it could work only
against people who have consciences non-violent resistance can
afflict. British India and the American South were Christian. The
monsters who control the District of Criminals now are not. Using
non-violent resistance against them would be like using it against a
crocodile.

How could it happen? For about a century, we have lived under
government by emergency. I have lived abroad in a couple of other
countries, so I know what it is like just to live. Most Americans do
not. Here we endure endless "wars," and "emergencies," in quotation
marks because they are as phony as a one dollar bill, not just the
military wars, WWI, WWII, etc. and etc., but also the "War on
Poverty," the "War on Drugs," etc. So my speculation is that the next
phase in the battle to subdue America will be launched with the
pretext of some new "war" or "emergency."

It could be financial via the impending, engineered "collapse of the
dollar." It could be military, via the attack on Iran. Another
terrorist attack across the country, even bigger than Nine Eleven
could launch it. My speculation is that the conspiracy could use a
medical attack. Among the advantages of such an attack is the fact
that it affects everyone. The victims don't even know they are under
attack. And Boosh has said in almost as many words that a contagious
epidemic of something like "bird flu," or some other concocted
disorder could trigger a "national quarantine."

What would that include? It would include the camps. Remember the
camps? One hesitates to call them "concentration" camps, but that is
where the population would be concentrated. Remember that the English
invented concentration camps to win the Boer War. Then Hitler, ever
the copy cat – he copied his racial "science" from people like Planned
Parenthood's Margaret Sanger – copied them. Now they sit here, built
by Halliburton, staffed, supplied, fenced, but empty, ready and waiting.

Waiting for whom? For illegal alien invaders of our country, brought
here by the Boosh treason gang? My guess is no, because no illegal
alien is incarcerated there, despite overwhelming provocations like
enormous numbers. There are only two kinds of people in this country:
illegal aliens and legal residents. If the camps are not meant for
illegal aliens, they are meant for us. One reason – preeminent among
many – could be a national epidemic.

A new "terrorist attack," or a national quarantine could be the best
"temporary" use for those camps. How would you get there? You would
get there by bus, supplied by the kindly federal government, which
would also help "solve" the "problem" of the guns. The Boosh treason
gang knows as much about the guns as I do. More. They know the militia
will not give them up. So, when the bus comes down the streets, would
the militia fall for this?

"We're not asking you to give up your guns, as we did in New Orleans.
That lawyer, the one we saw on television promising that, if we came
for his guns, somebody would die, scared us. The little, old lady the
SWATster from California disarmed, was a public relations disaster.
So, no, we certainly won't take your guns. We don't believe in that.
Taking your guns would violate the Second Amendment. Just get on the
bus. Leave your guns right where they are, in your gun cabinets. Be
reasonable. The bus will be full of women and children. In such
cramped conditions your guns could endanger them. The guns will be
where you leave them when you come home."

Would the militia fall for that? It sounds so "reasonable." It would
sound even more "reasonable," if a preacher from the totalitarian
"religious right" were there to plead with you to be "reasonable." Do
you really want to be a sorehead? Indeed, would the militia get on the
bus at all, with or without arms? Or would the abolition of the
government start at the curb? When the bus arrives, would it be too
late? Or would the bus find no one home?

Which logically raises the forbidding question of how the militia
would fight such fearsome weapons? Remember, I am writing under the
protection of the President of the United States. I advocate nothing.
I am simply speculating, wondering, which is certainly "reasonable" to
do in the present situation. What would a galvanized militia do?

Tradition would pick a leader, organize and recruit, thinking that the
new organization would grow quickly and do what is required. Sadly,
that would probably be the worst action to take. During a century and
more of activity, the conspiracy for world government has become quite
adept at the art of infiltration. It infiltrates any and every
organization that is or could become influential.

Indeed, before long the ringer the conspirators send to infiltrate the
new patriot organization would be running it. How? Simply because the
infiltrator would be the best member. He would be the man you always
call on. He would do the dirty jobs, the jobs no one else will do. He
would come early and stay late.

Other members of the group would be proud of him. "Good old Charlie.
He's the heart and soul of the group." Soon, the group would be
perverted, implementing a goal completely different from the one the
founder proclaimed. The organization would be working against itself,
useless. Remember the priceless New Yorker cartoon? It shows a dark,
smoky opium den, in which half a dozen men hold guns on each other.
The caption says, "You mean, we're all Treasury agents?"

Any leader that emerges would be bribed, co-opted, blackmailed or
killed. Hasn't this happened again and again? You don't need to guess
about it. I have named some of the fallen in previous pieces. So, my
speculation is that, when the feces hit the fan, the militia would
choose different methods. What would they do? If organization and
leaders wouldn't work, what would? How can you win a battle without them?

My guess is that first they would read Anabasis by Xenophon, a
historian who wrote some four hundred years before Jesus. Anabasis is
the story of some ten thousand Greeks, betrayed and stranded on the
Anatolian plateau, in what is now Turkey, who had to fight their way
through hundreds of miles and numberless Persian enemies, from ancient
Babylon, near modern Baghdad, to the Black Sea and home.

Their general, Clearchus, invited to a "peace conference" was captured
and killed. They had no leader. Yet, the ten thousand beat the
Persians, who outnumbered them by a factor too high to multiply. How?
Xenophon, who was one of them, relates that when the leader in a
Persian unit was killed, the unit would disintegrate. When a Greek
commander was killed, the next man in line became the leader. Every
Greek was a general. One of the most thrilling scenes in all
literature comes when the head of the column arrives and the others
hear them shouting, "The sea! The sea!"

How does this apply here and now? Remember, a military man really
should be writing this. I am what George Wallace used to call a
"pointy-head" – you can actually see the point on my head – not a
military man, but I am writing it because I haven't found a military
man who is. Remember also that I write under the protection and with
the authority of the President of the United States.

My speculation is that when the conspiracy for world government
finally does come all the way out into the open, when it tries to nail
the dictatorship down by imposing martial law, the militia would
employ a tactic the military men in the Nam used to call "target of
opportunity," in a species of guerrilla warfare. There would be
nothing to infiltrate; no address, no headquarters, no membership
records to seize. There would be no leaders to execute. Every man
would be a general, or, as one of my readers has suggested, a fish in
the sea, a fish with teeth, a sea teeming with piranha.

The militia would strike from the shadows and be gone before the world
government Nazis could respond. Wouldn't that get nasty? Mercy sakes,
yes, it would get nasty, nasty beyond the imagination of most
Americans to conceive. It would get nasty because the conspiracy for
world government is trying to impose a dictatorship and has already
killed tens of millions around the world for the purpose in the most
horrifying ways. They treat our own military men like dirt. If they
were to obey the Constitution, my guess is that none of this would
happen, but did you really think they would just put down their brain
fryers and walk away?

What would the militia do? First, pray that nothing happens to the
President. Yes, Boosh is a traitor, but remember that his successor
would be Darth Cheney, who could be his control. Yes, Soviet agent
Heinz Kissinger is a traitor, but the militia would probably not run
into him and the same with traitor David Rockefeller who actually
confesses in his autobiography that he is "part of a secret cabal
working against the best interests of the United States."

They are protected by layers of security. Of course, they could
accidentally become "targets of opportunity." Pray that they don't.
Honestly, I would hate to hear that treasonous scumbag Herr Kissinger
or David Rockefeller's entourage turned the wrong corner and were
obliterated by a superannuated 82nd Airborne unit ("Death From the
Sky") in a bloody cross fire that left their greasy body parts hanging
on a fence.


Advertisement

When and if – God forbid! – this thing starts to happen, how will you
know it is genuine, or phony? You will certainly know it is phony if
it kills large numbers of innocent bystanders, who just happen to be
present. That kind of thing is the telltale signature of governments
conducting Communist terror to intimidate populations, like the
bombings presently perpetrated in the Middle East. What we are
speculating about here, on the contrary, would regrettably target the
individual guilty perpetrators of world government crimes.

Who would they be? Some genius has said that all politics are local.
The conspiracy for world government has a big Achilles heel. Somebody
has to enforce the myriad dictatorial controls the conspiracy has
imposed. Some of those controls are installed by local governments
inspired by federal bribes. That is how the District of Criminals
nationalized the local police.

Others are administered by locally-based federal employees. They range
from the construction of your commode to the new, mandatory light bulb
loaded with extremely toxic mercury; from banning political signs for
the "wrong' candidate on your own property to prison for a cancer
victim who uses marijuana prescribed by his physician for pain, to the
use of "federal" land, and on and on and on.

The totalitarian insults are endless. Yes, the militia could reach the
monsters at the top only with the greatest difficulty, only by
accident that creates a "target of opportunity." But the pimps who
must impose the metastasizing dictatorship – and are essential to it –
are easy to reach. The militia knows who they are, where they are,
even where they live.

They could even live next door. Sadly, they have made themselves
progressively obnoxious. They strut and preen about their new power.
They can't be fired and make more money and benefits than you do. They
think they are the new Lords of Creation. As you read this paragraph,
each of you sees their exulting faces in mind's eye. What would happen
if one by one they disappear? Would not their ranks be roiled by
panic? Remember that the dictatorship could not work without them.
Would they start to call in sick?

What could such a tactic accomplish? Remember Alexander Solzhenitsyn?
His Gulag Archipelago introduced a new word to our language. Because
the Party line at the time called for constant reminders of the
horrors of the Soviet system, he was a media darling here for a few
years – until the famous speech at Harvard in which he denounced the
spiritual collapse of the West and said that like his own people we
have forgotten God. Our Communist media dropped him like a rock. He
has been back in Russia for many years. Today, few Americans have ever
heard of him.

Solzhenitsyn says this: "And how we burned in the camps later,
thinking: What would things have been like if every Security
operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been
uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say goodbye to his
family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests . . . people had not
simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of
the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had
understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the
downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers,
pokers or whatever else was at hand? . . . And you could be sure ahead
of time that you would be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what
about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely
chauffeur – what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked? The
Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and
transport and . . . the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!"

Solzhenitsyn concludes: "If . . . if . . . We didn't love freedom
enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation. . .
. [W]e hurried to submit. We submitted with pleasure! . . . We purely
and simply deserved everything that happened afterward." Are we aware
of the real situation? Do we love freedom enough? If not, we shall
deserve everything the conspiracy for world government is preparing to
do. Like Solzhenitsyn, you would have plenty of time to discuss it in
the Halliburton camps.

There is another Achilles Heel. Yes, it is perfectly true that the
psychos have weapons that would make most private arms look like sling
shots. But precisely because those weapons are so sophisticated, they
are run by computers. And the Freedom Forces have the nerds who run
the computers, and who know that defeat would mean the loss of their
internet freedoms. That is why Dr. No enjoys almost universal nerd
support. And they can hack into anything! I speculate that when the
fit hits the shan the nerds could bring the system down. What would
that do to the psychos' weapons? The plethora of history and economics
majors in the Dr. Paul ranks can easily be explained. He is the only
candidate who knows what they are talking about.

Remember, I do not advocate anything. I don't do anything. Because I'm
so decrepit I don't know anyone who does. I'm too decrepit to hit a
face with a pie. I'm simply speculating about what could happen, based
on where we are now, combined with the scary feedback I am still
receiving from the militia. The only thing I advocate is complete,
docile obedience to law, in the true spirit of Romans 13 and the
teachings of the President of the United States.

Which recalls the fact that fears for my own safety are now arriving.
Regular readers warn I could be killed myself. I do not believe it.
Why would anyone take the risk of rubbing out a man as meek, as mild
and inoffensive, as your doddering correspondent? But just in case
these warnings have substance, may I publicly suggest that I have
earned the services of a professional who will commit to do a thorough
job. My innumerable warrior grandma fans around the world would be
very disturbed were an amateur merely to mess up my good looks. There
is also the fact that these grandmas are already riled up. Believe me;
you don't want to make them any madder. For part one click below.

*********************************************************************

WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE

No comments: