[wvns] Tea Party Brings in $6 Million!

Tea Party Brings in $6 Million!
The Six Million Dollar Man - In One Day!!
December 17th, 2007
www.dailypaul.com

I'm not exactly sure what the final tally was, because last night the
campaign's server apparently crashed..

This morning the LA Times blog is reporting that the campaign raised
$6 million, breaking it's old record.

If the reported number holds up when officially reported to the
Federal Election Commission in early January, Paul will not only be
the only Republican candidate to oppose the Iraq war, he'll be the
only GOP candidate to increase fundraising totals each quarter this
year--from $640,000 to $2.4 million to $5.1 million to whatever this
quarter's final total becomes above $18 million with two weeks to go.

Way to go Revolution! We are making history.

This just in from the official site:

Ron Paul Raises $6 Million in One Day (12/17/07)

Candidate has most successful fundraising day in American political
history

ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA -- Congressman Ron Paul's presidential campaign
had a record fundraising day yesterday.

In a 24-hour period on December 16, the campaign raised $6.026 million
dollars, surpassing the one-day record of $5.7 million held by John Kerry.

During the day, over 58,000 people contributed to Dr. Paul's campaign,
including 24,940 first-time donors. Over 118,000 Americans have
donated to the campaign in the fourth quarter.
The $6 million one-day total means the campaign has raised over $18
million this quarter, far exceeding its goal of $12 million.

"We have the right message: freedom, peace and prosperity," said Ron
Paul 2008 campaign chairman Kent Snyder. "We also have the right
candidate: Dr. Ron Paul."

Congressman Paul will be campaigning in Iowa today and will be holding
a press conference at 12:45 pm at the Des Moines Marriott in the Des
Moines Room.

===

Boston Tea Party Speech 12/16/07
Posted December 17th, 2007 by Jane Aitken in Boston Tea Party Faneuil
Hall Jim Forsythe Ron Paul
Jim Forsythe PhD, Aerospace Engineer and former tanker pilot who flew
missions to Bosnia and Kosovo gave this speech at the Boston Tea Party
celebration for Ron Paul at Faneuil Hall, Boston today. Long live the
"Second American Revolution" of 2008.

Enjoy!

- Jane

"I can't wear my uniform and make a political speech, so instead I'll
just place my desert boots here to remind us all of our soldiers who
have served throughout our history, and are currently serving in the
Middle East.

On this historic day, I ask you to imagine that we are the 11,000
soldiers camped out with General George Washington at Valley Forge in
the winter of 1777. We come from every state in the Union. We are as
young as 12, as old as 60, and come from all walks of life. Look
around at your fellow patriots. Pick out four people. By the end of
winter, one of them will probably be dead. It might be you. Yet
despite your tragic loss this winter, you will be joined by others,
and in three long arduous years, you will defeat the British Empire,
despite overwhelming odds. You have come here today despite the risk
to your life, because you believe that Liberty is a cause worth
fighting for. In the words of John Stark, a New Hampshire Patriot, you
believe that we should "Live Free or Die, Death is not the worst of
evils."

But all this sacrifice could have been for nothing if the founding
fathers had chosen to set up a government as despotic as the one that
they rebelled against. This is exactly what happened to the French and
the Russians after their revolutions - they traded one tyrant for
another. Instead, the founding fathers set up a Constitutional
Republic, binding the government in the chains of the Constitution.
Our first President, George Washington voluntarily stepped down after
two terms, setting up a tradition that lasted until President FDR. We
owe an immense debt of gratitude to these men who risked everything
and sacrificed so much. We should heed their words and their warnings,
and reflect on how our country has lived up to their expectations.

In Common Sense, the document that helped spark the revolution, Thomas
Paine wrote:
"Our plan is commerce, and that, well attended to, will secure us the
peace and friendship of all Europe,"

In the Declaration of Independence, the founders laid out the train of
abuses of the King. Several of the abuses dealt with the overly
militaristic mercantilist approach of the British Empire.

"The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of
repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the
establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this,
let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

"He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the
Consent of our legislatures.

"He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to
the Civil Power.
"For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
"For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world."
Several weeks before his farewell address, Washington succinctly
stated his noninterventionist policy in a letter to James Monroe: "I
have always given it as my decided opinion that no nation had a right
to intermeddle in the internal concerns of another; that every one had
a right to form and adopt whatever government they liked best to live
under themselves."
In his farewell address, he spent a great deal of time on this issue,
concluding,
"The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in
extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little
political connection as possible."
Thomas Jefferson later stated:
"I have ever deemed it fundamental for the United States never to take
active part in the quarrels of Europe. Their political interests are
entirely distinct from ours. Their mutual jealousies, their balance of
power, their complicated alliances, their forms and principles of
government, are all foreign to us. They are nations of eternal war.
All their energies are expended in the destruction of the labor,
property and lives of their people."And he also said
"Never was so much false arithmetic employed on any subject as that
which has been employed to persuade nations that it is in their
interests to go to war."

These patriots believed that the proper role of the military was to
defend the Union. They were willing to fight and die for Liberty and
the Union. But they were not willing to risk the lives of fellow
Americans for the sake of increasing American influence overseas. They
had seen how the British Mercantilist form of government led to
constant war, and instead favored free trade and a non-interventionist
foreign policy. They restrained the ability of the government to go to
war by vesting the power to declare war in the legislative branch,
since as Madison wrote to Jefferson:

"The constitution supposes, what the history of all governments
demonstrates, that the executive is the branch of power most
interested in war, and most prone to it. It has accordingly with
studied care vested the question of war in the Legislature."

Now, fast forward to 1991. The cold war has ended, and I'm a young Air
Force 2nd Lieutenant, driving to Texas on my way to pilot training,
and the Gulf war begins. I'm too busy learning how to fly jet aircraft
to really examine the cause of the war. Certainly our government knows
what it is doing. But something doesn't seem quite right, since I
signed up to defend my country, and I'm not sure exactly how a war in
the Middle East is a direct threat to us.

After graduating, and getting assigned to KC-135 refueling aircraft, I
receive my first overseas assignment to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,
enforcing the no-fly zone over Iraq. We flew sorties daily next to the
Iraqi border, refueling fighter aircraft who patrolled the southern
no-fly zone. When I came home and told my friends and family about my
trip to Saudi, the general reaction was, "Oh, I thought the war was
over? Are we still over there?" Yes, we were, and I would go back two
more times over the next five years, stopping at one of our bases in
England on the way over.

Between trips to Saudi Arabia, I would also go to France and Italy to
fly combat support operations to enforce the no-fly zone over Bosnia.
And I also got to sit alert, and launch in support of transport
operations into Somalia. It was a surreal experience – coming back
from one foreign country to spend a few months with my kids before
launching for yet another foreign country. I flew with a married
couple that had a child. They could never be assigned overseas
together, since one of them needed to be with their child, so instead,
they alternated overseas assignments, seeing each other for a few
weeks before one or the other would go back overseas. We were at a
war-time ops tempo despite officially being at war with no-one. I
would earn three aerial achievement medals for flying combat support
missions, despite the fact that America had not declared war with any
country.

But the experience I will always remember is my flight into Dhahran
Saudi Arabia, to stay at the Khobar towers. Two weeks later,
terrorists would bomb this facility, killing 19 American soldiers. The
reason given to us by our intelligence officers was that the Saudi
people resented our being there, propping up what they saw as an
American puppet government dictatorship. Whether or not this is true,
it made me wonder why we were defending a country when the people of
that country didn't want us there. It was a chilling pre-cursor to
9/11, as 15 of 19 of the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. Even before
the Khobar towers bombing, we had been required to change into
civilian clothes on the way to and from the airfield, so the threat
had been known and anticipated. Yet politicians will say what most who
have served in the Middle East know is a lie – that they only attack
us because we are free. Although this may be part of it, things are
not that simple. And those that deny that occupation is part of the
motivation put my fellow solidiers at risk, as the Khobar towers
bombing will attest.

Clearly America has not heeded the advice of Paine, Jefferson,
Washington, and Madison, men who risked all that they had for our
freedom. We have spent over 16 years in an undeclared war with Iraq,
spending about one trillion dollars, and thousands of lives. Yes,
that's right – 16 years, ever since 1991. People tend to forget the
years between the Gulf Wars, but I don't, as that's when I was flying
combat support operations. How many more lives will we spend in Iraq?
Will my friends currently over there come home alive? How long will we
be there?

We've spent over fifty years in Korea, having fought an undeclared
war. In fact, President Truman didn't even bother to go to Congress,
but instead got his authorization from the United Nations! This was a
slap in the face for the brave soldiers who swore to uphold the
Constitution, which requires Congress to declare war. This
transgression along with the undeclared Vietnam War led to passage of
the War Powers Resolution, which actually seems to have made things
worse. Clinton sent the military into conflicts dozens of times during
his two terms, as I should know. And during Kosovo he bombed Serbia
for several months, after the House had voted against authorizing the
Air War. Did you know we are currently fighting in Columbia, South
America? We have over 700 bases in over 130 countries, with over ¼ of
a million military members stationed overseas (prior to Iraq).

As Dr Paul said in Iowa "Our Founding Fathers would be ashamed of us".

Madison's warnings are completely prophetic:

"Of all the enemies of true liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be
dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other.
War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and
armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing
the many under the domination of the few."

We are told over and over again to "support the troops", suggesting
that if we question going to war we have somehow disrespected the
troops. Well, I am a troop. And so are the other soldiers who have
donated more to Ron Paul's campaign than to any other candidate. We
signed up willing to sacrifice our lives to maintain liberty, just as
those soldiers at Valley Forge did to gain our liberty. The best
support people can give to the troops is to make sure that our
politicians obey the rule of law in declaring war. This will ensure
that we go to war carefully, and for the proper reasons, with well
defined objectives.

We are told over and over again, that if you don't support this
foreign policy, you are weak on defense. But how does stationing ¼ of
a million troops overseas while our borders are open provide a strong
defense? How does stationing troops in two Middle Eastern countries
provide a strong defense when it is well documented that occupation
helps recruit terrorist and drive suicide terrorism, as I experienced
in the bombing of the Khobar towers. Al Qaeda is reported to be
stronger than ever. How does delegating the pursuit of terrorists to
foreign governments like Pakistan, while attacking a country that had
not attacked us provide a strong defense.

For a strong defense, what we need is to protect our borders, not
attempt to remake borders overseas. We need to pursue a
non-interventionist foreign policy, with free trade and travel to
engender the good will of the world. And when we are attacked we need
to go after those that have attacked us, and only those that attacked
us. What we need, is Ron Paul. In his ten terms he has consistently
fought to protect our borders. He has consistently advocated a
non-interventionist foreign policy and free trade. And he advocated
directly targeting the terrorists, by voting to pursue them in
Afghanistan. He also sponsored a bill to target the terrorist directly
through constitutional means, but was ignored.

It has become abundantly clear to me that the revolution sparked by
the Boston Tea Party was gradually abandoned over the last two
centuries. Our non-interventionist foreign policy was abandoned by
Wilson, who said we should "make the world safe for democracy,"
leading to WW1. But the withering torch of freedom has once again been
re-ignited. The revolution began at Lexington and Concord 10 miles
west of this cradle of liberty. And the beginning of the second
American Revolution will also take place in Concord. But it will be
Concord, New Hampshire, headquarters of the New Hampshire Ron Paul for
President Campaign. Join Operation Live Free or Die and come help us
succeed in New Hampshire.

Do you want to return to the non-interventionist foreign policy our
founders envisioned? Who's foreign policy do you want - that of
Washington, or of Wilson? In honor of the first Boston Tea Party, I
would like to throw our current interventionist policy away,
symbolized by these dessert boots. And, in return, I would like to
take something back as well. I want our troops home from all across
the world, to do what they signed up to do – defend our country, and
the Constitution of the United States."

CNN coverage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2Lipn0lQd0

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:wvns-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:wvns-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
wvns-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/