[wvns] Is "Terror" A Bush-Cheney Fabrication?
Is the "Terrorist Threat" Another Bush-Cheney Fabrication?
Sherwood Ross, Global Research
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6793
In the most massive racial profiling since Japanese-Americans were
herded into detention camps in World War II, the Bush administration
after 9/11 required 80,000 Arab and Muslim foreign nationals living
here to be photographed, fingerprinted and subjected to "special
registration," The Nation magazine said. The publication reports an
additional 8,000 foreign nationals were sought out by the FBI for
interviews and more than 5,000 foreign nationals were put in
"preventive detention" --- a total of 93,000 people made to register,
subjected to interview, or jailed.
"Yet as of September, 2007, not one of these people stands convicted
of a terrorist crime," says an article titled, "Why We're Losing The
War on Terror." Reading the data it presents, though, and examining
other reliable sources, raises the question of whether the "terrorist
threat" to USA isn't wildly exaggerated or an outright fabrication.
Here's why:The above-cited pattern of dragnet arrests without trials
or convictions is being repeated across the Middle East with like
results. The Bush regime is literally framing thousands of innocent
men and boys to make it appear they constitute a "terrorist" threat to
America. Yes, boys, some as young as eight.
According to Nation magazine co-authors David Cole, a professor at
Georgetown University Law Center, and Jules Lobel, a professor at the
University of Pittsburgh Law School, the Bush regime has little to
show in the way of convictions of those it imprisoned in Guantanamo,
which ex-Defense Secretary Rumsfeld trumpeted housed "the worst of the
worst."
"The Pentagon's Combatant Status Review Tribunals' own findings
categorized only 8 percent of some 500 detainees held there in 2006 as
fighters for Al Qaeda or the Taliban. More than half of the 775
Guantanamo detainees have now been released," Cole and Lobel write.
Americans needs to ask, since Bush boasted as far back as 2003 the
U.S. had arrested 3,000 terrorist suspects, "Why didn't the government
try them?" As Jane Mayer reported in the July 3, 2006, The New Yorker,
"Only ten of the more than 700 men who have been imprisoned at
Guantanamo have been formally charged with any wrong-doing."
Mayer also wrote, when the Pentagon planned to screen the suspects via
"Article 5" hearings on the battlefields of Afghanistan, "the White
House cancelled the hearings, which had been standard protocol during
the previous fifty years, including in the first Gulf War." Why? Could
it be the Pentagon just wanted live, warm bodies, and innocence be damned?
Former President Jimmy Carter wrote in "Our Endangered Values"(Simon &
Schuster), after visiting six of the 25 U.S. prisons, the Red Cross
found "107 detainees under eighteen, some as young as eight years old."
Eight-year-old terrorists? And investigative reporter Seymour Hersh
reported there were 800-900 Pakistani boys in custody aged 13 to 15.
Never mind that the Red Cross, Pentagon, and Amnesty International
"have gathered substantial testimony of torture of children, confirmed
by soldiers who witnessed or participated in the abuse," according to
Carter. Apparently, the Bush regime is tearing elementary school
children away from their parents to build up its "terrorist" arrest data.
The British Guardian newspaper on March 15, 2005, carried a disturbing
interview with Dr. Rafiullah Bidar, regional director of the Afghan
Independent Human Rights Commission, of Gardez --- an entity funded by
the U.S. Congress to investigate warlord abuses, and supposedly an
American asset.
"All I do nowadays is chart complaints against the US military," Bidar
lamented. "Many thousands of people have been rounded up and detained
by them. Those who have been freed say that they were held alongside
foreign detainees who've been brought to this country to be processed.
No one is charged. No one is identified. No international monitors are
allowed into the US jails." He pulled out a handful of files: "People
who have been arrested say they've been brutalised - the tactics used
are beyond belief." Again, mass roundups, followed by no charges, and
harsh confinement with torture.
The Guardian said terror suspects are being housed in about 25 prisons
across Afghanistan, the hub of the U.S. prison network, and in dozens
of facilities in Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Jordan, Egypt, Thailand,
Malaysia, Indonesia and the British island of Diego Garcia.
Military officials estimate more than 60,000 Iraqis have been arrested
and detained since the U.S. invasion and returned GI's interviewed by
The Nation (July 30) said "the majority of detainees they encountered
were either innocent or guilty of only minor infractions." Army
Reserve Specialist Aidan Delgado, 25, of Sarasota, Fla., of the 320th
Military Police Company, said, "I read these rap sheets on all the
prisoners at Abu Ghraib and what they were there for. I look down this
roster and see petty theft, public drunkenness, forged coalition
documents."
Delgado added, "These aren't terrorists. These aren't our enemies.
They're just ordinary people, and we're treating them harshly." Even
U.S. intelligence officers admitted to the Red Cross 70 to 90 percent
of Abu Ghraib detainees are being held by mistake. Again, the same
pattern of criminal conduct by the Bush regime.
As for domestic terrorists, the FBI admitted in 2005 that it had yet
to identify a single Al Qaeda sleeper cell in the entire U.S. "And it
hasn't found any since," write Cole and Lobel, "unless you count the
Florida group arrested in 2006 whose principal step toward an alleged
plot to blow up the Sears Tower was to order combat boots and whose
only Al Qaeda 'connection' was to a federal informant pretending to be
Al Qaeda." In its most ballyhooed "terrorist" case against a U.S.
citizen, Jose Padilla was convicted only for attending an Al Qaeda
training camp and conspiring to support Muslim rebels in Chechnya and
Bosnia before 9/11, not for any of the heinous crimes he was initially
charged with planning.
Significantly, Cole and Lobel note in December, 2005, the bipartisan
9/11 Commission gave the Administration "failing or near-failing
grades on many of the most basic domestic security measures, including
assessing critical infrastructure vulnerabilities, securing weapons of
mass destruction, screening airline passengers and cargo, sharing
information between law enforcement and intelligence agencies,
insuring that first responders have adequate communications," etc.
Is this just more incompetence or is the White House deliberately lax
because it knows the terrorist threat is one it has largely
fabricated? In sum, the American people need to demand to know, "Why
so few trials?" Are there virtually no trials because, in fact, there
are no terrorists? Is the case against the thousands rotting in
prisons no stronger than the phony case Bush made against "terrorist"
Saddam Hussein with his WMD? Consider this final point: The last
"terrorist" strike on U.S. soil was the anthrax attack on Congress in
October, 2001 that killed five people --- and the anthrax used was
traced back to U.S. military facilities, George W. Bush,
commander-in-chief.
Sherwood Ross is a Miami, FL-based publicist who has worked as a
newspaper reporter, wire service columnist and radio talk show host at
WOL, Washington, D.C.
Sherwood Ross is a frequent contributor to Global Research.
*********************************************************************
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
Email ummyakoub@yahoo.com for instructions.
To leave this list, send an email to:
wvns-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:wvns-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:wvns-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
wvns-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
No comments:
Post a Comment