Saturday, July 28, 2007

[wvns] Israel knew 6 Day War illegal : memo

Secret memo shows Israel knew Six Day War was illegal

A senior legal official who secretly warned the government of Israel
after the Six Day War of 1967 that it would be illegal to build Jewish
settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories has said, for the
first time, that he still believes that he was right.

The declaration by Theodor Meron, the Israeli Foreign Ministry's legal
adviser at the time and today one of the world's leading international
jurists, is a serious blow to Israel's persistent argument that the
settlements do not violate international law, particularly as Israel
prepares to commemorate the 40th anniversary of the war in June 1967.

The legal opinion, a copy of which has been obtained by The
Independent, was marked "Top Secret" and "Extremely Urgent" and
reached the unequivocal conclusion, in the words of its author's
summary, "that civilian settlement in the administered territories
contravenes the explicit provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention."

Judge Meron, president of the International Criminal Tribunal for the
former Yugoslavia until 2005, said that, after 40 years of Jewish
settlement growth in the West Bank - one of the main problems to be
solved in any peace deal: "I believe that I would have given the same
opinion today."

Judge Meron, a holocaust survivor, also sheds new light on the
aftermath of the 1967 war by disclosing that the Foreign Minister,
Abba Eban, was "sympathetic" to his view that civilian settlement
would directly conflict with the Hague and Geneva conventions
governing the conduct of occupying powers.

Despite the legal opinion, which was forwarded to Levi Eshkol, the
Prime Minister, but not made public at the time, the Labour cabinet
progressively sanctioned settlements. This paved the way to growth
which has resulted in at least 240,000 Jewish settlers in the West
Bank today.

Judge Meron, 76, is now an appeal judge at the Tribunal. Speaking
about his 1967 opinion for the first time, he also tells tomorrow's
Independent Magazine: "It's obvious to me that the fact that
settlements were established and the pace of the establishment of the
settlements made peacemaking much more difficult."

Blaming restrictions on Palestinian movement for the devasatation of
the Palestinian economy, the World Bank earlier this month
acknowledged Israeli security concerns but added that many of the
restrictions were aimed at "enhancing the free movement of settlers
and the physical and economic expansion of the settlements at the
expense of the Palestinian population." The settlements and their
"jurisdictions" effectively control about 40 per cent of the area of
the West Bank.

The argument that the settlements are illegal, stated in successive UN
resolutions, and by the International Court of Justice advisory
opinion condemning the separation barrier in 2004, is reinforced by
such an authoritative source. It strengthens the political case in any
"final status" negotiations on borders with the Palestinians for
genuinely equitable land swaps of Israeli territory to a future
Palestinian state if Israel is to retain settlement blocks.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon secured a promise in 2004 from President
George Bush that large Israeli "population centres" in the West Bank
could remain in Israel in any such negotiations. In a subsequent
letter to the Palestinians, the President promised that final borders
had to be subject to agreement by negotiation.

Judge Meron's memorandum was obtained from the Israel State Archives.
His subsequent defence of it amounts to a direct challenge to Israel's
continuing contention that the Geneva Convention's provisions on
settling people in occupied territory did not apply to the West Bank
because its annexation by Jordan between 1949 and 1967 had been

The memorandum was written in September 1967 as the Eshkol government
was already considering Jewish settlements in the West Bank and the
Golan Heights, seized from Syria during the Six Day War. It says that
the international community had already rejected the "argument that
the West Bank is not 'normal occupied territory'."

It pointed out that the British ambassador to the United Nations, Lord
Caradon, had already asserted that Israel's position was that of an
occupier. It added that a decree from the army command saying that
military courts would "fulfil Geneva provisions" indicated that Israel
thought so too.

Judge Meron also says in his interview that such an argument would not
in any case have applied to the Golan Heights which had been
undisputed as sovereign Syrian territory prior to the Six Day War.

While the Olmert government has so far rejected calls for peace
negotiations by Syria's President Bashir Assad, it has been weighing a
welter of internal advice proposing that it explores talks seeking an
end to Syrian support for Hizbollah and Hamas in return for restoring
the Golan Heights to Syria.

The memorandum, details of which were published by the Israeli writer
Gershom Gorenberg last year, also says settlements built on private
land would explicitly contravene the 1907 Hague Convention.

The only implicit acknowledgement of the Meron memorandum - which Mr
Gorenberg established also went to Moshe Dayan, the triumphant Defence
Minister during the Six Day War - was that one of the first West Bank
settlements, Kfar Etzion, was initially called a "military outpost"
although it was already, in effect, a civilian settlement. The
memorandum said there was no legal prohibition against military posts
in occupied territory.

Ehud Olmert fought the Israeli election last year on a programme of
unilateral withdrawal from parts of the West Bank - usually thought to
mean dismantling settlements east of the separation barrier, which
cuts deep into the West Bank in places. But this strategy was
abandoned after the Lebanon war.

Mark Regev, the foreign ministry spokesman, said yesterday: "We do not
accept that the West Bank is occupied in the classic sense." He added
that it was not sovereign Jordanian territory before 1967 and it had
not enjoyed legal status since the British mandate, which had the
remit, underpinned by the League of Nations, of establishing a Jewish
national home.



To subscribe to this group, send an email to:


Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
Email for instructions.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

No comments: